Digital Spectrum NuVue 560 5.6-Inch Digital Photo Player (White)
Details
- Availability:
- No longer available through SilverGelatin.net
- List Price:
- $129.99
- Average Customer Rating:
- 2.5 out of 5
- Manufacturer:
- Digital Spectrum
Features
- High quality 5.6-inch LCD display
- 320 x 234 resolution
- Built-in CF/SD/XD/SM/MMC/MS memory card slot
- USB port for easy PC connection
- A/V out connection; hook up to your TV
Description
Digital Spectrum focuses on leading-edge digital-imaging products, including digital signage and digital photo frames.PRODUCT FEATURES:Easy insert and instant play, auto-start slide show;High resolution 5.6" color TFT LCD screen;JPEG picture viewing;Compatible with most major memory cards;Customizable slideshows, graphical OSD menus;Desktop or wall mount;Sleek decorative design.
Spotlight customer reviews
NuVue 560 does NOT support images it claims
[ Posted: 2008-01-18 ]
I got a NuVue 560 as a gift, and am very disappointed in the total lack of customer support, and it clearly does not perform as described in the documentation. Stay away from this one unless you have very low resolution jpeg.
Don't buy
[ Posted: 2007-12-31 ]
VERY poor picture quality. Card reader suddenly stopped reading the same card I've been using with it. Also the screen has dimmed to the point that it is basically not even visible. Trust me, this is not because of overuse, since I only used the thing about 6 times in the last year. It makes a faint buzzing noise that drives me crazy. Expensive piece of crap. Save your money for something better.
Decent Little Digital Frame
[ Posted: 2007-08-06 ]
I recently got one of these frames for free from some family and I was playing around with my photos trying to make them fit inside the full pixels of the frame. I read the included manual (don't bother it doesn't say much) and it says the pixels are 320x234. I tried scaling my images to that and they showed up tiny on the frame. I then went to the company website where the specs said 320x3 by 234. This confused me, and I didn't understand why it would be written like this. 320x3=960 so I tried scaling my images to that width with the matching height. This gave me perfect width, but the height was still a little short. After trial and error I have found that 960x710 is an optimal pixel resolution for this particular frame. This may of course stretch some of the images, but for me the difference is not that bad, and this frame is not of the highest quality to begin with, but at least now my photos fill the frame in its entirety.
Worthless - Steer Clear of this one
[ Posted: 2007-05-12 ]
Photo display quality is poor.
No built in memory.
No supporting documentation.
Cheap & Poor construction quality.
For the money, you can spend 30-45 extra on another brand and receive memory and better video quality.
PS - If I could give a Zero Star I would.
Simple, economical for photo displays
[ Posted: 2007-01-22 ]
As others have mentioned, ours did not come with a manual. However I found the manual in just a couple of minutes on the manufacturer's web site and printed it. We were able to get it to read from every memory card the relatives had, which included multimedia card, Sony memory stick, an XD card, and a flash memory card. The resolution is not great, but that is what allows it to hold a lot of photos and be less expensive than most digital frames.
I also liked this one because it was so simple (the company makes more advanced models, but some start up with a menu). If you ignore the extra buttons on this one, it just starts up playing a slide show and continuously rotates through all the pics on the memory card. This makes it a perfect gift for a non-tech person to have a lot of photos to look at. (you just have to take their card to a computer and load more pics on it when you want to add pics). Mine came with other cables, but we haven't used them.