Oregon Scientific DS6310-R 3MP ThinCam Digital Camera with Cradle (Red)
Details
- Availability:
- Usually ships in 1-2 business days
- List Price:
- $119.95
- Our Price:
- $69.95
- Savings:
- 41%
- Average Customer Rating:
- 2.0 out of 5
- Manufacturer:
- Oregon Scientific
- Release Date:
- 2005-11-15
Ready to Buy?
- List Price:
- $119.95
- Our Price:
- $69.95
Features
- 3.0 megapixel CMOS sensor produces images of up to 2032 x 1524 pixels
- Features built-in flash, 4x digital zoom and a 1.5-inch color TFT display
- Includes USB transfer cradle, software, USB cable, rechargeable Li-Polymer battery, hand strap and carrying case
- Supports SD cards for extra memory
- Dimensions: 3.5 x 2.2 x 0.5 inches (WxHxD)
Description
This micro-size digital camera takes great 3 megapixel pictures anytime, anywhere. It is small enough to carry in your pocket, has a built-in flash, 4x digital zoom and a 1.5" color TFT screen for great quality pictures on-the-go.
The Oregon Scientific DS6310-R 3MP ThinCam Digital Camera with Cradle (Red) offers the perfect combination of size and image quality. This micro-size digital camera takes great two-megapixel pictures anytime, anywhere. It is small enough to carry in your pocket, has a built-in flash, 4x digital zoom and a 1.5-inch color TFT screen for great quality pictures on the go. The camera includes eight megabytes of internal memory and SD card support for extra memory. The 3.0-megapixel CMOS sensor produces high-quality images of up to 2032 x 1524-pixels. The included cradle can be used for conveniently downloading images to your computer.
What's in the Box
DS6310-R digital camera, USB transfer cradle, USB cable, built-in rechargeable batteries, hand strap, carrying case, and software.
Spotlight customer reviews
Don't buy CMOS cameras
[ Posted: 2008-05-06 ]
Most good digital cameras use CCD lens technology. CMOS is old, normally used for security cameras. Even though I don't own this camera (and I generally hate reading reviews by people who don't own the product), I have owned a Polaroid camera of similar specs & price - with a CMOS lens. It mysteriously died in less than a year (company would service, but it would cost almost as much as purchase price for part) and picture quality was horrible. I regret not having done my research, b/c I took pics of my first baby with it and now with my second baby on a Canon, I can totally see the difference in quality.
General tip I've learned: if the company doesn't have a history of making cameras (35mm cameras), then don't trust it! (Kodak and Fuji are probably OK, but not the best.) I remember Oregon Scientific from the calculators I used while I was flunking calculus...!
Small lightweight camera
[ Posted: 2007-06-01 ]
This camera takes good pictures for being so compact. A little difficult at the begining to take a picture, but after I followed the instructions it was a snap.
NOT WORTH IT
[ Posted: 2007-01-16 ]
PICTURE QUALITY FOR A 3 MEGAPIXEL CAMERA IS VERY DISAPPOINTING! THE ONLY GOOD THING IS ITS SMALL SIZE. WOULD NOT RECOMMEND THIS CAMERA FOR ANYTHING BUT A CHILDS TOY AND AT THE SELLING PRICE IT IS TOO EXPENSIVE FOR THAT.
Don't bother
[ Posted: 2006-11-24 ]
Extremely low quality pics. Short battery life. Not worth spending any money on.
I got this camera for free thank goodness. Now I am just trying to find a way to get rid of it.
Pretty Good
[ Posted: 2006-09-01 ]
I got this camera back in 2003 and I loved it..i would take it everywhere...but then no too long ago it just stopd working and i really dont know what was wrong w it..but hey for a first time slim camera is not bad @ all..